home  |  book  |   RSS  |  contact  |


    Let's Get a Few Things Straight About "Free Trade"

    EVERYONE seems to be ganging up on "free trade" right now, from Donald Trump to alt-right chappies like Vox Day.

    They are arguing that the market is soulless, and doesn't care a whit if communities are hollowed out when the market moves on or when cheap products produced by low-wage Chinese take American jobs. Here is Day quoting SF old master Jerry Pournelle:

    But do understand, what is conserved is lower prices. Nor social stability. Not communities. Not family life. Indeed those are often disrupted; it’s part of the economic model. Under free trade theory, it’s better to have free trade than community preservation, better to have ghost towns of people displaced because their jobs have been shipped overseas; better to have Detroit as a wasteland than a thriving dynamic industrial society turning out tail finned Cadillacs and insolent chariots and supporting workers represented by rapacious unions in conflict with pitiless corporate executives.
    First of all, we don't have completely free trade, never have. Secondly, as Deirdre McCloskey makes very clear in her Bourgeois Era books, the Great Enrichment of the last 200 years is founded not on accumulation, not on "free trade" but on innovation.

    Wait, she was wrong. It was not "innovation" that did it but the failure to block innovation.

    You can have all the capitalist accumulation, the freest trade in the world, and the world full of innovators. But if you allow the ruling class and its supporters to block innovation -- and they will if you give them half a chance -- then you are back to the good old days of economic stasis.

    When the innovators are allowed to sell their innovations then you get disruption, because the folks doing stuff the old way are going to have to accept lower wages and even get put out of work. We humans hate that and will do anything to block the innovators and continue to enjoy our customary way of life and income.

    I would argue that the history of the last 200 years is the history of the failed attempts to block the innovators. They tried to stop the machine spinners. They went in for machine wrecking in the Luddite riots. They forced automobiles to a speed limit of 6 mph. They licensed labor unions to prevent management from changing working conditions. Communism is an attempt to return to the Eden of perfect community before its disruption by Modern Industry. Fascism is an attempt to return to the Eden of blood and tribe. Environmentalism is an attempt to return to an Eden of an unspoiled Earth, and that is why environmentalists want to block the innovations of fracking and GMO foods.

    Yes, Jerry Pournelle is right. Unblocked innovation means an end to social stability. But you can't have that social stability unless the rulers have the power to block innovation. And we are to understand that in the days when the ruling class had the power to block innovation society practiced a downward mobility where second sons of the nobility shoved aside the middle class and the second sons of the middle class shoved aside the lower class, who just had fewer babies and died faster than the higher classes. You can have your stability, but it comes at a price that is paid by the traditionally marginalized.

    And let us not forget what happened in Detroit. It wasn't free trade that killed Detroit but political power. The ruling class gave the auto companies and the labor unions special privileges that allowed them to jack their prices and wages way up above the market. It was great fun, for the workers and the managers, while it lasted.

    You can say if you like that it was free trade that killed Detroit. But what would it have taken to save it? 15% tariffs on imports, or 50% tariffs? What about a suspension of labor laws to force wages down? And what about if and when the import car companies started building cars in the non-union South?

    The point is that the argument about "free trade" misses the point. The point is that reality always wins in the end. You can take your pick. Do you want to surrender to market prices and let overpriced and overprivileged Detroit go to the wall? Or do you want to wait for a Great Depression or an invasion? That's the way things used to be settled. If your ruler wasn't up to the mark then sooner or later some warrior lord would invade and loot and plunder his good rich acres. These days we do it metaphorically. We fail to keep up with the market at our peril. But our modern peril is not the old peril where all the men are killed and the women sent away into slavery. The peril is that we must accept the verdict of the market and work for less wages that in the past.

    And there is more. The campaign against "free trade" makes a rather big assumption. It assumes that politicians and regulators can engineer a better social outcome than market prices. Really? I'd say that the record is pretty clear. It is that politicians and regulators suck at delivering anything except dividing the electorate and promising free stuff to their supporters.

    Why in the world, in the decade after the real-estate meltdown and the Obamacare disaster, can anyone suggest that monkeying with the market is going to produce a good outcome for America and American workers?

    I have a better idea! Let's unwind some of the government programs that make it difficult for workers to get jobs. Let's abolish the minimum wage, credentialism, child labor laws, payroll taxes and their unjust pension programs. Let's make it easy for employers to hire workers and let's make it easy to fire them. Let's encourage workers to save for a rainy day and for their retirement without the government getting in the middle.

    In the old days, before the welfare state, in the dark and savage days of the 19th century, almost every worker, high and low, belonged to a fraternal association or a mutual-aid society. These organizations sprang up, starting in the 18th century, when the dispersion of people across the wide world encouraged them to create an artificial notion of brotherhood beyond the boundaries of blood kin. So they imagined themselves in a brotherhood of Masons, who were not manual workers; Elks and Eagles, who were not beasts of the field. And they created a virtual community, so that an itinerant worker could find a friend wherever he showed up, and also buy insurance against death and a helping hand for his widow. But the welfare state put all that out of business.

    Let's get things straight. It is utter folly to bet against the market. The market is today's economic reality and the only thing we know is that the reality and the prices will change tomorrow. The way to preserve community and family is to preserve community and family, which were and are the best bulwarks against the cruel winds of change.

    The only certain thing is that if you let government start messing around with the market process it will screw things up and make them worse. Deteroit's problem started when the government repealed the laws against combinations and allowed the auto cartel to flourish and jack its wages and prices into the stratosphere. Without that very unfree trade policy then maybe Detroit wouldn't have crashed, but only declined into an impecunious old age.

    Still, if we didn't have economic ruin and collapse what would government do then, poor thing?

    perm | comment | Follow chrischantrill on Twitter | 07/25/16 6:52 pm ET

    Trump Night: What You Are Not Allowed to Say

    DESPITE my disinterest in the Republican National Convention I did get to hear most of the speeches of Peter Thiel, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump in Cleveland on July 21, 2016. I listened through my particular virtual noise canceling device, which says that, once government has got past protecting us from enemies foreign and domestic, it is tempting us with things we shouldn't have. So most of...

     click for more

    perm | comment | Follow chrischantrill on Twitter | 07/22/16 6:01 pm ET

    Cop Killers Target White Working Class

    I just had another epiphany. The first one this year was to realize that the liberal turn in the 1960s to race and gender politics had an unanticipated consequence. After the turn the white working class would be the poster boys for white racism. That's what Archie Bunker was all about in All in the Family. This nobody living in a small home in Queens became the poster boy for racism, sexism, ...

     click for more

    perm | comment | Follow chrischantrill on Twitter | 07/21/16 6:05 pm ET

    The Fault is Not In Our Elites, But in the World They Made

    FOR some reason, I can't get excited enough about the Republican National Convention to watch it. Perhaps it's because I am going to observe my 70th birthday at the end of the month. Or maybe it's because much bigger things are afoot than Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. I wrote some disparaging words about the failures of the "administrative faction of the ruling class" at American Thinker ...

     click for more

    perm | comment | Follow chrischantrill on Twitter | 07/20/16 6:27 pm ET

    |  July blogs  |  June blogs  |


    “I Want a President”

    Georg Simmel’s Sociology

    Charles Murray’s By The People

    Thomas Piketty’s Capital

    The Spirit Level

    McCloskey’s “Bourgeois Era”

    Karl Polanyi’s Great Transformation

    A Look at the Left: “Contra-deBoer”


    Download latest e-book draft here.


    A New Manifesto
    A spectre is haunting the liberal elite—the spectre of conservatism.


    The Crisis of the Administrative State
    It wasn’t supposed to be like this.

    Government and the Technology of Power
    If you scratch a social reformer, you will likely discover a plan for more government.

    Business, Slavery, and Trust
    Business is all about trust and relationship.

    Humanity's Big Problem: Freebooters and Freeloaders
    The modern welfare state encourages freeloaders.

    The Bonds of Faith
    No society known to anthropology or history lacked religion.

    A Critique of Social Mechanics
    The problem with human society reduced to system.

    The Paradox of Individualism
    Is individualism the gospel of selfishness or something else?

    From Multitude to Civil Society
    The larger the government, the smaller the society.

    The Answer is Civil Society
    In between the separated powers.

    The Greater Separation of Powers
    If you want to limit power then you must limit power.

    Conservatism Three by Three
    Conservatism, political, economics, and cultural.

    The Culture of Involvement
    Imagining lives without the welfare state

    The Poor Without the Welfare State
    Can the poor thrive without the welfare state?

    The Middle Class Without The Welfare State
    How would the middle class live without all those middle-class entitlements?

    Liberals and the Welfare State
    Liberals, the ruling class of the administrative welfare state.

    From Freeloaders to Free Givers
    The path to the future lies through moral movements.

    The Real Meaning of Society
    Broadening the horizon of cooperation in the “last best hope of man on earth.”

    conservative manifesto


    AAM Book of the Day

    Armstrong, Karen, A History of God

    AAM Books on Education

    Andrew Coulson, Market Education
    How universal literacy was achieved before government education

    Carl Kaestle, Pillars of the Republic
    How we got our education system

    James Tooley, Reclaiming Education
    How only a market in education will provide opportunity for the poor

    James Tooley, The Miseducation of Women
    How the feminists wrecked education for boys and for girls

    E.G. West, Education and the State
    How education was doing fine before the government muscled in

    AAM Books on Law

    Hernando De Soto, The Mystery of Capital
    How ordinary people in the United States wrote the law during the 19th century

    F. A. Hayek, Law Legislation and Liberty, Vol 1
    How to build a society based upon law

    Henry Maine, Ancient Law
    How the movement of progressive peoples is from status to contract

    John Zane, The Story of Law
    How law developed from early times down to the present

    AAM Books on Mutual Aid

    James Bartholomew, The Welfare State We're In
    How the welfare state makes crime, education, families, and health care worse.

    David Beito, From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State
    How ordinary people built a sturdy social safety net in the 19th century

    David Green, Before Beveridge: Welfare Before the Welfare State
    How ordinary people built themselves a sturdy safety net before the welfare state

    Theda Skocpol, Diminished Democracy
    How the US used to thrive under membership associations and could do again

    David Stevenson, The Origins of Freemasonry
    How modern freemasonry got started in Scotland

    AAM Books on Religion

    David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
    How Christianity is booming in China

    Finke & Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
    How the United States grew into a religious nation

    Robert William Fogel, The Fourth Great Awakening and the Future of Egalitarianism
    How progressives must act fast if they want to save the welfare state

    David Martin, Pentecostalism: The World Their Parish
    How Pentecostalism is spreading across the world


    Sponsored: 64% off Code Black Drone with HD Camera
    Our #1 Best-Selling Drone--Meet the Dark Night of the Sky!

    The Great Arab Implosion and Its Consequences
    A strategic review of the collapse of the Sunni Middle East.

    Lose the Story, Lose the Culture
    Michael Novak reminds how American culture is threatened by the left's Cult of Secularism

    Paul Ryan's Agenda
    Paul Ryan & Republicans’ “A Better Way” Reform Agenda Is Conservatives’ Path Forward.

    I’m voting for Donald Trump...
    so I went to see him speak. Protesters broke my nose. - The Washington Pos

    > archive


    cruel . corrupt . wasteful
    unjust . deluded



    After a year of President Obama most Americans understand that the nation is on the wrong track. But how do we find the right track? Americans knew thirty years ago that liberalism was a busted flush. Yet Reaganism and Bushism seemed to be less than the best answer.

    But where can we turn? Where are the thinkers and activists of the old days? Where do we find the best ideas? And how do we persuade our present ruling class to loosen its grip on power so that we can move the locomotive of state back onto the right track?

    With all of our problems it seems like the worst of times.

    In fact, this is the best of times. Under the radar a generation of great thinkers have been figuring out what went wrong and conjuring up visions of a better future. This book, "An American Manifesto: Life After Liberalism" is an introduction to their ideas, and to the great future that awaits an America willing to respond to their call.

    Although this book is addressed to all Americans, conservative, moderate, and liberal, and looks to a nation that transcends our present partisan divide, I must tell you that liberals will have the most difficulty with the book. The reason is simple. I am asking liberals to give up a lot of the power they have amassed in the last century. But we are all Americans, and we must all give up something for the sake of the greater good.


    I am Christopher Chantrill and I am writing this book in full view. I'll be blogging on the process and the ideas, and I'll be asking you, dear readers, to help. Read the blog. Read the articles as they come out on American Thinker and ponder over the draft chapters here on this site.

    Then send me your reactions, your thoughts, and your comments. You will help more than you know.


    What Liberals Think About Conservatives

    [W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
    Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican

    US Life in 1842

    Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
    Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

    Taking Responsibility

    [To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
    MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050

    Society and State

    For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
    David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

    Socialism equals Animism

    Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
    F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


    [Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
    Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values

    Responsible Self

    [The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
    Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


    presented by Christopher Chantrill
    Data Sources  •  Contact